Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Ignoring implicit elements in the merge may drastically reduce the PCS set size #130

Open
slarse opened this issue May 22, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Ignoring implicit elements in the merge may drastically reduce the PCS set size #130

slarse opened this issue May 22, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@slarse
Copy link
Collaborator

slarse commented May 22, 2020

Currently, implicit elements are being merged along with everything else. From both a performance and reliability standpoint, it may be an idea to ignore implicit elements altogether in the merge. This makes sense from a standalone standpoint, but does not necessarily make sense from an API usage standpoint.

I will try it out and see if it results in any improvements.
@slarse slarse added the enhancement New feature or request label May 22, 2020
@slarse
Copy link
Collaborator Author

slarse commented May 22, 2020 •
edited
Loading

This could also lead to performance improvements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@slarse