-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
landfast (or static) sea ice calculation #395
Comments
Here are the functions that I'll be adding.
|
Thanks Dan Mostly cosima-recipes uses a minimal number of functions. It would also be neat to use cf compliance. i.e. the SH mask could be
and
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I would like to provide a function to cosima-recipes that allows one to compute landfast sea ice.
Landfast sea ice is defined as sea ice that is fixed to the coast, shelf, tongue, iceberg and does not move within a time period. In a numerical model that reports sea ice at daily time intervals then one needs to define when the sea ice has become fastened. This is not as straightforward as finding when sea ice velocities are zero and this due to primarily wind shear (and likely in the future surface gravity waves) that are imparting dynamic forces that are translating to even very small velocities. Hence a two-week window is used to define landfast ice as a shorter period could lead to false assessments for low wind events and a longer period would provide too much temporal smoothing. Lemieux 2015 provides further (a more detailed) justification for averaging window, with another important point that the 'fast ice threshold' (5e-4 m/s) needs to be larger than the basal stress parameter (CICE default 5e-e5 m/s).
With the above being said, it is noted that ACCESS-OM2 does not include fast ice dynamics in the sea ice model. Hence when computing/reporting/masking for fast ice in ACCESS-OM2, one is cautioned in calling it 'fast ice' and potentially a more appropriate name for such simulated sea ice could be 'static ice'.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: