Instructions for walking profile too detailed

[GrHalbgott]

When using the walking profile (maybe others as well), the instructions are very detailed. This probably is due to the high count of segments in the graph, so if you had a circle with 7 segments, it wouldn't say "walk around the circle", but "walk 3 s, walk 2 s, walk 2 s" and so on.

The examples show what is meant. The used segments belong to different paths, so they are included in the instructions. Sometimes it is a street side switch, this could/should be included as an instruction. Maybe it also helps if all instructions under 2/3/4 s are disregarded or merged with the adjacent ones (would make sense in second example).

Also for HEAL. Suggestion from HEAL team is to disable instructions, but I think they should be kept

[TheGreatRefrigerator]

That's something you don't want to do in the frontend but directly in ors.
And it will be pretty difficult to choose a logic that works for all usecases. E.g. in the example above, it's not actually crossing the street, but the route takes the street(probably due to having a sidewalk mapped or idk) and then leaves it onto an actual mapped sidewalk.