You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There does not seem to be any requirement for the pod that runs the Terraform commands to be in the same namespace as the Terraform CR. It would be good for the namespace of the resources created by the controller (pods, configmaps, secrets) to be configurable by the user between one of two modes -- (1) same namespace as Terraform kind and (2) same namespace as controller.
The second mode would allow the controller to be limited to its own namespace (with a Role instead of a ClusterRole; see GalleyBytes/helm-charts#76) for all resources except the Terraform kind.
This is important in multi-tenant environments where organizations do not want to grant too much access to a particular service.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There does not seem to be any requirement for the pod that runs the Terraform commands to be in the same namespace as the Terraform CR. It would be good for the namespace of the resources created by the controller (pods, configmaps, secrets) to be configurable by the user between one of two modes -- (1) same namespace as Terraform kind and (2) same namespace as controller.
The second mode would allow the controller to be limited to its own namespace (with a Role instead of a ClusterRole; see GalleyBytes/helm-charts#76) for all resources except the Terraform kind.
This is important in multi-tenant environments where organizations do not want to grant too much access to a particular service.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: