The anonymous donations should be counted in number of contributors

[maryjaf]

Based on Griff's comment, the anonymous donations should be counted in number of contributors

As you can see in below pic there is 1 unique donor if the anonymous donations aren't counted
but based on new requirment the anonymous should be counted

cc: @mohammadranjbarz @Meriem-B

[MoeNick]

We don't know how many anons are those, so I don;t think it's a good idea.

[maryjaf]

We don't know how many anons are those, so I don;t think it's a good idea.

I infer form Griff's comment that every anonymous donation should be counted as a one unique contributor

[Meriem-BM]

Hey @MoeNick I'm checking some issues now, what do we think about this one, should we still be considering it?

cc: @maryjaf

[MoeNick]

I can't find a robust solution to find a unique number of anon donors, unless we assume a sender address as an anon donor, so each sender address that is not related to a userID would sound like one anon-Donor (tbh that assumption is not always valid)
Im not sure we have the sender address in donations records, but if we have, it might be a good idea to count the unique userID plus the unique sender address to solve this problem.

First I'd suggest to check logic of current counting donors fro all chains.

@Meriem-BM

[MoeNick]

As far as Im not contributing on Giveth these days, @divine-comedian should be in the loop for this and making the final decision.

[divine-comedian]

@Meriem-BM lets remove this one from our plate for now.