Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow input from user on actual matches #10

Open
thibautjombart opened this issue Jul 14, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

Allow input from user on actual matches #10

thibautjombart opened this issue Jul 14, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@thibautjombart
Copy link

Not sure if this is sci-fi, as it sounds like machine learning, but the idea would be for the user to tick boxes indicating actual matches, refine the search, etc.

@kplaney
Copy link
Collaborator

kplaney commented Jul 14, 2016

Thanks for the idea! Haha totally fine if it sounds Sci Fi - it would be interesting to think about how to do this.

I need to update the README (work got the best of me right after the Hackathon) but I volunteered to maintain the repo.

@zkamvar
Copy link
Contributor

zkamvar commented Jul 14, 2016

👽

Since the underlying structure is distance matrices for each category, I wonder if this could take the form of modification of the weights. I'd imagine it would take some refactoring to be able to allow for updates (creating new objects and whatnot, but it's worth investigating!).

@thibautjombart
Copy link
Author

thibautjombart commented Jul 18, 2016

Yeah, I think you could treat that as an optimization problem, i.e. find the vector of weights which maximizes the fit to user's classification of matches. One question will be on the choice of the quantity optimized; I can see:

That would be a fairly easy problem I think (param space is small), but worth a bit of research (and probably a paper). Happy to help with the stats bits / proof of concept.

What d'yall think?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants