Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AM_ManagementRestrictionOrRegulationZone_allow zero-to-many specialisedZoneType #131

Open
sMorrone opened this issue Oct 11, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
endorsed The change proposal is endorsed by the MIG. impact on TG The change proposal has an impact on the TG. impact on UML The change proposal has an impact on the UML diagram. non-breaking change The change proposal does not prevent backward compatibility of the schema

Comments

@sMorrone
Copy link
Collaborator

Change proposal description

Allow multiple occurrences of the specialisedZoneType element

Proposed solution

Technical details

Current definition
<element minOccurs="0" name="specialisedZoneType" nillable="true" type="gml:ReferenceType">
should be updated as follows:
<element maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="0" name="specialisedZoneType" nillable="true" type="gml:ReferenceType">

Additional information

Proposal reason

This change proposal is needed to fit specific use cases, as specified below:

  1. The attributes zoneType and specialisedZoneType are contextually aligned (the specialisedZoneType further specialises the type of management, regulation or restriction zone provided in the zoneType) .
    Currently, the zoneType attribute can be provided with the multiplicity one-to-many (many top level classes), therefore the specialisedZoneType attribute should be provided with the multiplicity "zero-to-many" to be able to include specialised values of all top level classes provided in the zoneType, whenever this is applicable.

  2. A specific area can be at the same time subject to various restrictions / regulations or management regimes which may define diverse activities within those areas. This can lead to several regimes in the area, therefore multiple specialised zones could be assigned under the same top level class of zoneType defined by a competent authority.

Example from the Environmental Noise Directive (END) reporting

The END requires protection of quiet areas in open country and inside agglomerations. In the END reporting data model, the quiet areas are modelled as an extension of the INSPIRE AM ManagementRestrictionOrRegulationZone.
A competent authority may delineate a quiet area in the following ways:

a) quiet area in open country

b) quiet area inside agglomeration(s)

c) quiet area which spatial extent covers the areas outside and inside agglomeration(s). In this particular case, the INSPIRE AM attributes could be provided as following:

Addressed schema

https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/schemas/am/4.0/AreaManagementRestrictionRegulationZone.xsd

Impact on INSPIRE TG / IR

This change proposal impacts the Technical Guidance document as well as the UML diagram.

Change proposer

European Environment Agency

@sMorrone sMorrone added impact on TG The change proposal has an impact on the TG. impact on UML The change proposal has an impact on the UML diagram. for Sub-group The change proposal is to be assessed by the Sub-group non-breaking change The change proposal does not prevent backward compatibility of the schema labels Oct 11, 2024
@fabiovinci
Copy link
Collaborator

Sub-group meeting on 11.11.2024:
The Sub-group reviewed the change proposal and decided to approve it.
The change proposal will be presented for approval at the upcoming MIG-T meeting.

@fabiovinci fabiovinci added for INSPIRE MIG-T The change proposal is to be assessed by the INSPIRE MIG-T. and removed for Sub-group The change proposal is to be assessed by the Sub-group labels Nov 12, 2024
@sMorrone sMorrone added endorsed The change proposal is endorsed by the MIG. and removed for INSPIRE MIG-T The change proposal is to be assessed by the INSPIRE MIG-T. labels Jan 10, 2025
@sMorrone
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The MIG-T members approved the change proposal at the 80th MIG-T meeting. The two-week period for objections by MIG members expired without any comments, so the proposal is now endorsed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
endorsed The change proposal is endorsed by the MIG. impact on TG The change proposal has an impact on the TG. impact on UML The change proposal has an impact on the UML diagram. non-breaking change The change proposal does not prevent backward compatibility of the schema
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants