Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Arcs] Dispute over Sprinter Drive + Fuel Liaison #118

Open
turmoilbyrd opened this issue Jan 12, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

[Arcs] Dispute over Sprinter Drive + Fuel Liaison #118

turmoilbyrd opened this issue Jan 12, 2025 · 2 comments
Labels
arcs Issue for Arcs

Comments

@turmoilbyrd
Copy link
Contributor

turmoilbyrd commented Jan 12, 2025

There was a dispute over whether the bonus move from Sprinter Drive should trigger Fuel Liaison

i.e. Copy to move, then use Sprinter Drive for an extra move.
Does this extra move also give a Fuel?

Related case

Sprinter Drive has been ruled in the past to allow a spreading movement: Catapult and drop off many ships, then each ship can take a move separately. Does this mean these moves all give one Fuel each?

Another related case

In the discussion of the above, a related case was brought up

Copy to secure Passage Storm. Take 5 moves.
Do those five moves each give a Fuel?

@turmoilbyrd
Copy link
Contributor Author

turmoilbyrd commented Jan 12, 2025

My opinion is that none of these bonus move count as "copy to move". So they don't give fuel.

Also related

@yggdrasilsYeoman
Copy link

yggdrasilsYeoman commented Jan 13, 2025

This ruling I believe would also affect the Interaction of Command Chaos with Psionic Liaisons by way of the Secured effect potentially providing a Copy-produced Influence action.

Bears mentioning that the discrepancy mentioned here stems from the CW ruling on Dealmakers.. While true that the extra actions from Sprinter Drives themselves come from modifiers, not directly from a New Action like Bargain, I could not find any other ruling excluding modifier-produced actions as triggers if they happen within the Copy pip.

@jdyearsley jdyearsley added the arcs Issue for Arcs label Jan 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
arcs Issue for Arcs
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants