Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GRU - Historic Footprints BIN vs PAD Enhancement #1310

Open
fvankrieken opened this issue Dec 9, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

GRU - Historic Footprints BIN vs PAD Enhancement #1310

fvankrieken opened this issue Dec 9, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@fvankrieken
Copy link
Contributor

For the upcoming 25A cycle due around mid-February, GRU is requesting a change to said check. Requires changes in this repo (for QA app) but primarily in the db-gru repo.

The request:

In the output reports, we discovered that there are BINs in the Historic Building Layer that are also present in the current Building Footprint Layer. We are asking to add a field to the output report denoting cases where BIN is being reused so we can filter for such cases. In other words, after running all Historic BINs through Geosuppport also check if the BIN is present in the latest Footprint file. If the BIN is in latest Footprint File indicate so it in the separate field.

Seems relatively straightforward. Offhand, I don't remember the format of the output - we might need a separate csv if the current output is not inclusive of all bins, which seems likely. However, this is a relatively new test and I don't remember the format. Will take just a little research and then some slight back and forth with GRU to confirm

@damonmcc damonmcc moved this from New to Backlog in Data Engineering Dec 24, 2024
@fvankrieken fvankrieken moved this from Backlog to 📬 Next in Data Engineering Jan 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: 📬 Next
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant