We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
@rothpc says: I tend to prefer a more C++ approach for handling memory allocations, so the MemoryUtils functions would use something like:
MemoryUtils
template<typename T> T* allocate(I n);
where it is assumed that type I is a parameter on MemoryUtils as suggested above. Error handling suggests exceptions with this approach.
I
Need to add basic exception handling to ReSolve in order to implement this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
rothpc
pelesh
No branches or pull requests
@rothpc says: I tend to prefer a more C++ approach for handling memory allocations, so the
MemoryUtils
functions would use something like:where it is assumed that type
I
is a parameter onMemoryUtils
as suggested above. Error handling suggests exceptions with this approach.Need to add basic exception handling to ReSolve in order to implement this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: