-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Species with missing scientificname, genus, species, and commonname #269
Comments
This should be assigned to Sunny since it's her data |
Does she have a github account?
|
These data are not my field data collected from EBI farm. EBI farm did not have these species planted. In addition, all my data from EBI farm are on species level. I have looked but not found the literature for these data. I think you can delete them. |
Issue moved to PecanProject/bety-data #8 via ZenHub |
There are 19 species records that have no scientificname, genus, species, or commonname. All are associated with citation_id 199 (Xiaohui Feng, field data).
Some are apparently plant communities. A few appear to be specific species, and four have no information.
For communities please give a descriiption that we can put in the commonname field (similar to how the USDA plants database has entries for plant types ("Tree", "Subshrub") or at least the name of a specific community.
Notably, all of these records are for
c2n_[root, leaf, stem]
orseedling_mortality
; none are associated with a particular site, and although they were collected pre 2000, all havechecked = -1
are not associated with their original citation. One option would be to delete these.These were discussed three years ago in Redmine 737.
Presumably "PFTs" would be a better place for such community level definitions, but is beyond the scope of what we can do presently with the database.
(19 rows)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: