Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Species with missing scientificname, genus, species, and commonname #269

Closed
dlebauer opened this issue Mar 17, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed
Assignees

Comments

@dlebauer
Copy link
Member

There are 19 species records that have no scientificname, genus, species, or commonname. All are associated with citation_id 199 (Xiaohui Feng, field data).

Some are apparently plant communities. A few appear to be specific species, and four have no information.

For communities please give a descriiption that we can put in the commonname field (similar to how the USDA plants database has entries for plant types ("Tree", "Subshrub") or at least the name of a specific community.

Notably, all of these records are for c2n_[root, leaf, stem] or seedling_mortality; none are associated with a particular site, and although they were collected pre 2000, all have checked = -1 are not associated with their original citation. One option would be to delete these.

These were discussed three years ago in Redmine 737.

Presumably "PFTs" would be a better place for such community level definitions, but is beyond the scope of what we can do presently with the database.

select id, AcceptedSymbol from traits join species on traits.specie_id = species.id 
        where scientificname = '' and commonname = '' ;
id AcceptedSymbol
2925 prairiemix4woody
2932 SORI2
2922 prairiemix4forb
2888 POBA
2892 POMATRI
2895 POEU
2899 prairiemix6
2902 HEGR4*HEMA2
2904 ASLA5
2905 ASOO4
2910 DESM
2911 ECHI
51169
2921 Prairemix2-11
51106
51107
51111
2923 prairiemix4grass
2924 prairiemix4legu

(19 rows)

@mdietze mdietze removed their assignment Mar 18, 2015
@mdietze
Copy link
Member

mdietze commented Mar 18, 2015

This should be assigned to Sunny since it's her data

@dlebauer
Copy link
Member Author

Does she have a github account?
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 7:42 AM Michael Dietze [email protected]
wrote:

This should be assigned to Sunny since it's her data


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#269 (comment).

@mdietze
Copy link
Member

mdietze commented Mar 18, 2015

@lovelilyinfall

@lovelilyinfall
Copy link

These data are not my field data collected from EBI farm. EBI farm did not have these species planted. In addition, all my data from EBI farm are on species level. I have looked but not found the literature for these data. I think you can delete them.

@dlebauer
Copy link
Member Author

Issue moved to PecanProject/bety-data #8 via ZenHub

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants