Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Test/update notebooks with new version of Bibliometrix (3.0) #6

Open
juancastilla opened this issue May 30, 2020 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #9
Open

Test/update notebooks with new version of Bibliometrix (3.0) #6

juancastilla opened this issue May 30, 2020 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #9

Comments

@juancastilla
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@juancastilla juancastilla changed the title Test notebooks with new version of Bibliometrix (3.0) Test/update notebooks with new version of Bibliometrix (3.0) May 30, 2020
@mlcanales
Copy link
Contributor

Checked "R notebook" in last commit (added a search also). Only got depreciated one function so all good to go. Note that it looks like there still are some errors with dimensions in the matrix obtained from compiling from different sources. Might be a good idea to keep the workflow with pandas.

@mlcanales mlcanales linked a pull request Jul 19, 2020 that will close this issue
Parsing bibliographic data with Pandas #9
Open
@mlcanales
Copy link
Contributor

After running some tests, I think is definitely worth it to bypass the initial procedures through pandas (See pull requests for the full notebook on it). Will discuss this with Erick on Tuesday 21 July.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Parsing bibliographic data with Pandas Research-Intelligence/Research-Intelligence
2 participants
@juancastilla @mlcanales