You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the original writing of the disease modules, we embedded some assumptions about equipment being available. Now that we have an explicit accounting of equipment being available, we should refactor this.
Hi @joehcollins @EvaJanouskova, naive question about how this PR deals with module parameters which already embed assumptions about equipment availability. To give a concrete example: the probability that a woman receives blood pressure measurement during an ANC appt is based on observed data, and hence already includes assumptions about equipment availability. If we wanted to self-consistently capture the effect of equipment availability, this probability should therefore increase (and if so, by how much?) if equipment is established as being present for the appt. Is this (or a similar logic) already included in the PR?
In the original writing of the disease modules, we embedded some assumptions about equipment being available. Now that we have an explicit accounting of equipment being available, we should refactor this.
Originally posted by @marghe-molaro in #1124 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: