what's the difference between class-aware and agnostic?

[scut-salmon]

Hello,
I found that the classification is also work for agnostic method, so what's the difference between class-aware and agnostic? Are they produce the same mAP result?
Thanks for your time.

[SunskyF]

agnostic have 8 bbox_pred num_output(for foreground and background). It may have some difference in mAP. agnostic can be faster and use less memory

[xiaohu2015]

Hi, the background part is not trained, why not use only 4 bbox_pred num_output

[SunskyF]

@xiaohu2015 I think that background part is used in training. In proposal_target_layer.py,

py-R-FCN/lib/rpn/proposal_target_layer.py

Line 188 in 290dba7

bg_inds = np.where((max_overlaps < cfg.TRAIN.BG_THRESH_HI) &

, we use it to get bbox_inside_weights which used in loss_bbox

[xiaohu2015]

@SunskyF The code you presented is to select the RoI of negative (bg), usually, we only train the class score for RoI of bg, but not train the locations. Hence, I don't understand why use 8 (K^2) bbox_pred num_output. In original paper, it is said that only 4(k^2) outputs are needed

[SunskyF]

@xiaohu2015 I think u are right. The bg roi are not used in training bbox. 4(k^2) is enough. However, I try that training with 4 num_output in pascal_voc. It gets 74.3 mAP, compare with 76.2 mAP which has 8 num_output. Maybe my modify is wrong or random?

[xiaohu2015]

@SunskyF Maybe some other reasons, but I still think 4 is enough. The author of this git can answer our question?