-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 102
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Request adoptopenjdk & Temurin container build images be published to alternate hosting site #3830
Comments
This was discussed at the PMC meeting on Dec 4. The plan is to proceed with designing alternate location/locations suitable for build and delivery images. |
We shall look at publishing our images to ghcr.io and then mirroring them elsewhere (e.g. azure CR for performance) as desired. |
@gdams Following on from the PMC discussion we had earlier this month, what do we need to do to set up a suitable registry associated with the temurin-build repo that can be used for public and private images? |
Updating the title of this one to include the Temurin images also and moving this to the iteration directly after the Jan release. |
@smlambert Moving of the Temurin images should be a separate task and not covered under this issue IMHO as the solution will not necessarily be the same, particularly with respect to permissions of certain images. |
Proposal for build images to replace adoptopenjdk/*_build_image
This will require changes to https://ci.adoptium.net/job/centos7_docker_image_updater/ - it's probably about time we renamed that job anyway so this will provide a good opportunity to set up another job in parallel ;-) |
At the moment, the build images [1][2] are published to Docker Hub.
The OpenJ9 Community farm and IBM Semeru Runtimes farm pull these images for our Linux build environments for x64 (amd64), ppc64le and aarch64 (arm64). Docker Hub has recently implemented a pricing change [3] that negatively impacts these pulls. We are requesting Adoptium to consider publishing these to an alternate source. Here are a few alternatives I have found.
[1] https://hub.docker.com/r/adoptopenjdk/centos7_build_image
[2] https://hub.docker.com/r/adoptopenjdk/centos6_build_image
[3] https://www.docker.com/blog/november-2024-updated-plans-announcement/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: