You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'd like to open the discussion about how optional nodes should appear when they are:
locked
unlocked
selected
The appearance of the locked state may not need to change, but 'unlocked' should have a smaller degree of affordance to a required Node, to signify that it's not necessary to progress.
The appearance of the selected state should be so that in terms of the information hierarchy, it's less important than a required Node.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'd like to open the discussion about how optional nodes should appear when they are:
The appearance of the locked state may not need to change, but 'unlocked' should have a smaller degree of affordance to a required Node, to signify that it's not necessary to progress.
The appearance of the selected state should be so that in terms of the information hierarchy, it's less important than a required Node.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: