Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature] Allow for sourcePVC wildcard for StatefulSets/VolumeClaimTemplates #1231

Closed
PrivatePuffin opened this issue Apr 23, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@PrivatePuffin
Copy link

Describe the feature you'd like to have.
StatefullSets using VolumeClaimTemplates, or operators creating VCT-like structures, use a standard format of VCTNAME-NUMBER.
By giving us the option to use a wildcard * in the SourcePVC, we could ensure appropiate objects for all VCT PVCs are created.

Downside of which, is that we also need to deal with the requirement of having multiple secrets that currently exists.

What is the value to the end user? (why is it a priority?)

How will we know we have a good solution? (acceptance criteria)

Additional context

@PrivatePuffin PrivatePuffin added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 23, 2024
@tesshuflower
Copy link
Contributor

At some point we may be trying to implement support for volume group snapshots, which would then work by taking in a label selector to pick PVCs. I think it would make sense to use this approach rather than wildcards as right now a single replicationsource only works with 1 pvc. See volume group enhancement: #1116

@PrivatePuffin
Copy link
Author

At some point we may be trying to implement support for volume group snapshots, which would then work by taking in a label selector to pick PVCs. I think it would make sense to use this approach rather than wildcards as right now a single replicationsource only works with 1 pvc. See volume group enhancement: #1116

Agreed!

@PrivatePuffin PrivatePuffin closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Apr 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants