You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As part of this enhancement, I would recommend the drop-down field "Padding Type" be set to "Use Separator Character" as default.
If you think logically, if someone has manually entered characters in the separator field, they are more likely to want to use those same characters in the padding field. Previously, I would copy/paste into that field as I didn't even realise there was a drop-down.
If someone specifically wants different padding characters, they will 'look' for this drop-down - however, someone who isn't looking for this feature will not. Hence, defaulting to "Use Separator Character" is the more logical default option.
@bbusschots I disagree about the inferring the type from the value of the separator char (and the padding char for that matter). That was the original setup and it gave me a headache trying to getting the code to handle this setup correctly. That's why I split the characters and the type to different variables/elements.
I do like the idea of having one element for the character/alphabet. It seems a good simplification.
For the separator and padding characters, the symbol alone can be used to infer the type:
For arrays of strings, if the strings are longer than a single character, the first character is used.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: