You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, we assume NLoop to operate on existing channel/peer.
But if the peer we want to have a channel against is itself a boltz, (i.e. we want to have a direct channel against the swap service provider, ) we can request them to open a channel when we don't have any.
Also, in the loop in swap, if the channel_id is not specified but peer_id is, we can consider opening a new channel instead of doing loop_in.
But I'm not sure what is the best to do in such cases, it may surprise users for their behavior.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, we assume NLoop to operate on existing channel/peer.
But if the peer we want to have a channel against is itself a boltz, (i.e. we want to have a direct channel against the swap service provider, ) we can request them to open a channel when we don't have any.
Also, in the loop in swap, if the
channel_id
is not specified butpeer_id
is, we can consider opening a new channel instead of doing loop_in.But I'm not sure what is the best to do in such cases, it may surprise users for their behavior.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: