You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, we have CDOMSL and CDOMSN which are both related to spectral slope between 320-400nm.
Submitted data for 49NZ20231006 have CDOM-S275-295 which has a reference in the cruise report stating "More informative however are values of the spectral slope (Helms et al., 2008) between 275 and 295 nm,
S275-295...". Which references this paper.
I'm not sure if this requires an expansion of our definition or a proliferation of parameter names (which seems more likely).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, we have CDOMSL and CDOMSN which are both related to spectral slope between 320-400nm.
Submitted data for 49NZ20231006 have CDOM-S275-295 which has a reference in the cruise report stating "More informative however are values of the spectral slope (Helms et al., 2008) between 275 and 295 nm,
S275-295...". Which references this paper.
I'm not sure if this requires an expansion of our definition or a proliferation of parameter names (which seems more likely).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: