We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In referenced 3.61 vector spaces are set to be finite dimensional.
We can't make use assumption for V from 3D.18
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree. Do you have a solution?
I know how to solve it if we can take a basis of V, but how to do it if Axler avoids basis of infinite-dimensional stuff?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Define $\phi_v$: $F$ -> $V$ as $\phi_v(f) = fv$, for $v \in V$ and $f \in F$.
$\phi_v \in L(F, V)$, so we can define $\Phi$: $V$ -> $L(F, V)$ as $ \Phi(v) = \phi_v $
Then we can examine the mapping to show that $\Phi$ is invertible.
No branches or pull requests
In referenced 3.61 vector spaces are set to be finite dimensional.
We can't make use assumption for V from 3D.18
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: