Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Solution to 3D.18 wrongly assumes that V is finite-dimensional #6

Open
4DA opened this issue Dec 14, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Solution to 3D.18 wrongly assumes that V is finite-dimensional #6

4DA opened this issue Dec 14, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@4DA
Copy link

4DA commented Dec 14, 2020

In referenced 3.61 vector spaces are set to be finite dimensional.

We can't make use assumption for V from 3D.18

@celiopassos
Copy link
Owner

I agree. Do you have a solution?

I know how to solve it if we can take a basis of V, but how to do it if Axler avoids basis of infinite-dimensional stuff?

@4DA
Copy link
Author

4DA commented Dec 15, 2020

Define $\phi_v$: $F$ -> $V$ as $\phi_v(f) = fv$, for $v \in V$ and $f \in F$.

$\phi_v \in L(F, V)$, so we can define $\Phi$: $V$ -> $L(F, V)$ as $ \Phi(v) = \phi_v $

Then we can examine the mapping to show that $\Phi$ is invertible.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants