Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 11, 2019. It is now read-only.

Better UX for launching a token #82

Open
lsaether opened this issue Dec 15, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Better UX for launching a token #82

lsaether opened this issue Dec 15, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@lsaether
Copy link
Contributor

During user testing, one of the most prominent pain points for users was the launch page. The fields presented nakedly were confusing to them, and they didn't know how to proceed without guidance. To better enable user friendliness we can reduce the launch page or provide more information about what to fill in for it. There are three options:

  1. Provide information tooltips for each field which explain what that field is for and how to fill it in.
  2. Break out the launch page into multiple wizard steppers, each one providing information for that step and some fun / encouraging words.
  3. Reduce the launch to just the essentials: name and symbol. We then push the rest of the information to be added later after the user has had a chance to explore the ecosystem and see what others have done.
@acrdlph
Copy link
Member

acrdlph commented Dec 18, 2018

Mostly implemented with #91 StepWizard

I just added helper text popovers for each step (on a new branch).

What is still missing:

  • form validation for the different steps
  • more fun stuff
  • some encouraging stories while you are waiting for deployment to complete
  • more intuitive entry for the tags
  • nav / progress component

@lsaether
Copy link
Contributor Author

lsaether commented Dec 18, 2018

Let's split these into separate issues ^^^

Since we can implement tags separately from the encouraging user stories while loading. Since validation is easy, lets define the more fun stuff and lump that into its own issue together too

Relevant to loading screens: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEklZ4K0DIs :)

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants