Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request for Dataplex Lake IAM #687

Open
Chloe-Carayon opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #692
Open

Request for Dataplex Lake IAM #687

Chloe-Carayon opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #692
Labels
enhancement New feature or request needs:triage

Comments

@Chloe-Carayon
Copy link

What problem are you facing?

We are interested in using dataplex_lake_iam.

In a Data Mesh Architecture, Dataplex can enhance data ownership management through data domains. It allows us to define Lakes, Zones, and Assets, and link these Assets to BigQuery Datasets and/or GCS Buckets. This setup provides an opportunity to manage permissions and their inheritance directly on the data. Utilizing Lake IAM Binding via Crossplane would greatly improve the management of data mesh permissions for data in BigQuery Datasets and GCS Buckets.

What could help solve your problem?

Implement the following resources:

I would be happy to contribute and implement the resources if you approve ! :)

@Chloe-Carayon Chloe-Carayon added enhancement New feature or request needs:triage labels Jan 3, 2025
@Chloe-Carayon Chloe-Carayon changed the title Dataplex Lake IAM Request for Dataplex Lake IAM Jan 3, 2025
@mergenci
Copy link
Collaborator

mergenci commented Jan 6, 2025

Thanks for your interest @Chloe-Carayon. We are more than happy for you to contribute 🙌 You can follow this guide.

@Chloe-Carayon Chloe-Carayon linked a pull request Jan 8, 2025 that will close this issue
3 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request needs:triage
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants