Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Archives – consider adjusting Level terminology #21

Open
brutaldigital opened this issue Sep 24, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Archives – consider adjusting Level terminology #21

brutaldigital opened this issue Sep 24, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@brutaldigital
Copy link

Rob,

Our archives team are completely confused by the LUX terminology in use to designate archival levels (Work Class: Set, etc.)

Is there any scope for asking the Getty to adding terms to AAT? 'Official' ISAG(g) terms are:

3.1.4 Level of description
Purpose: To identify the level of arrangement of the unit of description.
Rule: Record the level of this unit of description.
Examples:

  • Fonds
  • Sub-fonds
  • Series
  • Sub-series
  • File
  • Item

Tom
tomcrane added a commit to tomcrane/linked-art-net that referenced this issue Oct 21, 2024
@tomcrane
https://github.com/digirati-co-uk/pmc-lux/issues/21
2a70ed6
@brutaldigital
Copy link
Author

Display labels adjusted. Proposal to Getty to be submitted via LUX team

@azaroth42 azaroth42 mentioned this issue Oct 21, 2024
Open
tomcrane added a commit to tomcrane/linked-art-net that referenced this issue Oct 21, 2024
@tomcrane
https://github.com/digirati-co-uk/pmc-lux/issues/21
9ae45d0
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@brutaldigital