Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

More integration testing #85

Open
3 tasks
nphilipp opened this issue Jul 6, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
3 tasks

More integration testing #85

nphilipp opened this issue Jul 6, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
maintenance Something outside of a full-scale project testing & CI This affects local testing or CI automation

Comments

@nphilipp
Copy link
Member

nphilipp commented Jul 6, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Story

As a contributor to mirrors-countme,
I want that its basic functions are tested in a more integrated way,
so that I don’t just have to depend on unit tests (which might get things wrong when testing in isolation).

Acceptance Criteria

The commonly used functionsare tested in an integrated way, using synthesized test data which resembles the real deal:

  • parsing logs ⇒ raw DB
  • summarizing raw DB ⇒ totals DB
  • trimming old data
@nphilipp nphilipp converted this from a draft issue Jul 6, 2023
@nphilipp nphilipp added maintenance Something outside of a full-scale project testing & CI This affects local testing or CI automation labels Jul 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
maintenance Something outside of a full-scale project testing & CI This affects local testing or CI automation
Projects
No open projects
DNF mirrors-countme Maintenance Board
Status: New
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@nphilipp