Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scope remaining work on iceflow library development #30

Open
trey-stafford opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Scope remaining work on iceflow library development #30

trey-stafford opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@trey-stafford
Copy link
Contributor

trey-stafford commented Aug 27, 2024

Scope the work required to support the other datasets valkyrie & the iceflow notebooks supported.

@trey-stafford
Copy link
Contributor Author

trey-stafford commented Aug 29, 2024

High priority tasks (3-5 days)

I consider these tasks a high priority, as they represent functionality currently existing in valkyrie that we would like to replicate:

Medium priority (~7 days)

  • Develop example showing iceflow and icepyx working together #29
    • This was not supported directly by valkyrie, but the iceflow notebooks do
      use icepyx to find and visualize ICESat2 data. The notebooks did not support
      ITRF transformations of ICESat2 data, however. For parity with the existing
      notebooks, we may want to add support for the latest version of icepyx.
    • Estimating 2-3 days for integration allowing search/download and ITRF
      transformation support.
  • Add confirmation step for downloads #34
    • This issue is to add some support to notify users about especially large
      downloads, and to re-consider the API around that. Currently, the code is
      setup to download whatever matches a users' search, which could be quite
      large!
    • Estimate: 1-3 days.
  • ATM1B qfit files without a header use hard-coded ITRF values #35
    • This issue is about how the source ITRF is determined for ATM1B data, and
      will likely require interfacing with PIs of the ATM1B datasets to get
      clarification. I am less certain of an estimate on this, but if we get a
      prompt response from PIs invovled with these datasets, it could only take a
      day or two to make necessary changes (if any).

Low priority (3-5 days)

  • Add support for ILVIS2 v2 #20
    • valkyrie did not support ILVIS v2, so this is "low" priority. However, we
      probably want to implement this at some point. Estimate is 3-5 days.

@trey-stafford trey-stafford self-assigned this Aug 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant