Change label of 'specimen identifier'

[mbrochhausen]

This follows up on this discussion in the OBIB issue tracker:
biobanking/biobanking#88

The discussion established that OBIB's 'specimen ID' and OBI's 'specimen identifier' are representing different entities. Hence, OBIB in their meeting today proposed to change the label of OBI 'specimen identifier' to prevent misunderstanding. Since the OBI class is a subclass to centrally registered identifier, maybe 'centrally registered specimen identifier" would be an option?

[sebastianduesing]

Thanks for following up about this. We discussed this on the OBI dev call on 10.16.2023 and determined that we don't want to require that any identifiers that have "centrally registered identifier" as their parent have "centrally registered" as part of the label, so we don't intend to add it to "specimen identifier."

[ddooley]

OBI now suggesting a package deal:

1. OBI rename "specimen identifier" to "centrally registered specimen identifier"
2. OBI request to take on OBIBI "specimen ID" - rename to "specimen identifier", alt label "specimen ID". Parent IAO identifier.
3. Seperate issue: propose to IAO: "centrally registered identifier" go under "identifier"

Mathias importantly notes: CRID insists upon a registry identifier component to the specimen (or other type of) id.
Argument for OBIB to move to OBI is to encourage consistent use - and clear choice between "specimen identifier" and the CRID version (a child under peer "centrally registered identifier".

OBI will take action after hearing back from OBIB crew.

[bpeters42]

@mbrochhausen - any updates from the OBIB crew?

[ddooley]

@mbrochhausen - ping on this?

[ddooley]

@mbrochhausen ping!