-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 569
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Variable problem of lithium_ionModel #4355
Comments
Can you provide a minimum working example about this bug? |
I'm not sure if this detail is a bug, but I think the amount of heat generated by the current collector is a bit small. |
The calculations are correct. For example, for a 10 um thick copper collector at a current density of 3 mA/cm2 (one side coat), the ohmic heating is 1.55E-5 W/m3. At the same time, the value completely disagrees with reality. It should be several orders of magnitude higher. This is due to a simple reason. The calculated ohmic heating is for conduction through the (collector) plane; in practice, the heating is related to conduction in the (collector) plane. Getting the correct value would require solving an additional PDE in 2D. I believe that as it stands, ohmic heating for current collectors is a bit misleading, but I guess it is required. |
pybamm.lithium_ion.DFN(). Is there a problem with the expression of the two variables related to the heating of positive and negative current collectors? Their heating power is only on the order of 1E-5.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: