Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue 7 has reoccurred adter updating to 0.7 version of this plugin #10

Open
adxsoft opened this issue Jan 27, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@adxsoft
Copy link

adxsoft commented Jan 27, 2024

Previously I have had the patched plugin (as per issue #7) in order to open current page in VSCode and the patch has worked well.

After updating the plugin from the patched 0.0.5 to the official version 0.0.7 I cannot open current page any more so I think its the same path problem that was reported in issue #7 even though the author believes it was fixed.

For now I am sticking with the patched version until the problem is resolved.

This is a great plugin (thanks!!) .. I have included the plugin folder that you need to pop into ~/.logseq/plugins folder as a workaround.

logseq-open-in-code.zip

@e-zz
Copy link
Contributor

e-zz commented Feb 7, 2024

Hi there,
I might be able to help. But before asking for any other information from you, I would suggest to check few things.

  • Did you choose the correct editor in the plugin settings?
    image
    (I use the stable version of VSCode)
  • Did you try to open a page that had not been created yet, like an empty journal page? Be sure to try again with a valid page (existent on disk).
  • If there is still warning about something doesn't exist, please check the VSCode windows setting. The "safest" way in this case is to open in a new windows for each page.
    image

Hope this helps. And please leave any further question here. I will try to look into it when I have time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants