Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

RFOX - stale rewards address #8578

Open
gomesalexandre opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

RFOX - stale rewards address #8578

gomesalexandre opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@gomesalexandre
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

Spotted by @woodenfurniture in #8552 (review):

There's some odd caching behavior where a thorchain address from a completely separate wallet is prepopulated in the address input. I noticed this when connecting metamask without snap installed, and noticed the address was populated - I assumed it's because that wallet actually has FOX staked and it was pulling from the contract. But when I disconnected metamask and re-connected with a completely different wallet with nothing staked, the same thorchain address was populated.

On a cache clear seems to resolve this.

References and additional details

N/A

Acceptance Criteria

  • Able to repro and no stale rewards address ever, no matter the state of your diff. connected wallets

Need By Date

No response

Screenshots/Mockups

No response

Estimated effort

No response
@gomesalexandre gomesalexandre added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 14, 2025
@gomesalexandre gomesalexandre changed the title RFOX - stale rewards address issue RFOX - stale rewards address Jan 14, 2025
@gomesalexandre gomesalexandre mentioned this issue Jan 14, 2025
Open
1 task
@0xean 0xean moved this from Backlog to Up next / groomed in ShapeShift Dashboard Jan 15, 2025
@NeOMakinG NeOMakinG self-assigned this Jan 15, 2025
@NeOMakinG NeOMakinG moved this from Up next / groomed to In progress in ShapeShift Dashboard Jan 15, 2025
@NeOMakinG NeOMakinG moved this from In progress to Up next / groomed in ShapeShift Dashboard Jan 15, 2025
@NeOMakinG NeOMakinG removed their assignment Jan 15, 2025
@NeOMakinG
Copy link
Collaborator

I did try to reproduce, literally impossible... Hopefully woody is able to!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
ShapeShift Dashboard
Status: Up next / groomed
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@NeOMakinG @gomesalexandre