You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Several people have brought up this feature as a nice thing to have. This could actually be somewhat tricky given shpool's existing architecture because of the way we have a per-session lock.
We may want to have a notion of readwrite sessions and readonly sessions the same way that abduco does.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Multiple people talking to the same shpool session may run into trouble because we currently protect against one user connecting to the daemon belonging to a different user to protect against priviledge escelation. I suppose we could add an off-by-default config option to allow this though.
While supporting simultanious connections is a possibility for shpool, I don't think multiple cursors is in the cards. Merely mirroring sessions can be easily done in a shell-agnostic way, but multiple cursors would require knowing much more about how the inner shell works than shpool is able to know.
Several people have brought up this feature as a nice thing to have. This could actually be somewhat tricky given shpool's existing architecture because of the way we have a per-session lock.
We may want to have a notion of readwrite sessions and readonly sessions the same way that abduco does.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: