- [X] write header into
f3ffNNNN.dat
files - [X] deg –> degen to match larch’s _feffdat group
- [X] use polarization correctly in feffpath library (fix test_materials.py around line 56)
- [X]
capture rat and ipot from STRUCT, accumulate ipot and rat wrappers as part of call to add_scatterer, also geom for python wrapper - [X] capture a list of Z numbers so ipots can be readily translated to atomic species
- [X] capture header information in C struct, propagated into wrappers
- [X] check for existance/readability of phase.pad at level of feffpath.c
- [X] python wrapper / Larch plugin
- [X] nose testing for feffpath generated
f3ffNNNN.dat
files - [X] SWIG-less perl library (uses Inline::C)
- [ ] SWIG-less python library (Matt has started this)
- [ ] _wrapper tests not currently working
- [X] get stand-along potph program to run all the way through
- [X] test that stand-alone works all the way through
- [X] turn it into a library with content of libpotph.json as it’s input
- [X] write a C wrapper with the content of libpotph.json as its struct
- [ ] write a stand-alone feff.inp –> libpotph.json converter
- [ ] write a larch plugin which is a feff.inp –> struct wrapper converter, i.e. take a feff.inp as input and give a libpotph object as its output
- does NOHOLE work?
- does SPIN work? is it needed for exafs?
- how much of AFOLP, FOLP, ION, RGRID, UNFREEZEF, INTERSTITIAL,
JUMPRM do we want to support?
- AFOLP: yes
- FOLP: yes
- ION: reluctantly, yes
- RGRID: no idea…
- UNFREEZEF: no idea…
- INTERSTITIAL: no idea…
- JUMPRM: probably not
- does the iafolp parameter need to be carried around? seems that it serves to indicate that folp was filled with the value given with AFOLP.
- what is the point of capturing polarization and ellipticity at this stage? is there any effect on the potantials? or can they be put off until libfeffpath?
- are we safe ignoring CFAVERAGE, MULTIPOLE, RPHASES
- the following seem outside the scope of feff85exafs and outside what the FP wanted to share: PMBSE, TDLDA, PLASMON
- the following are outside the scope of feff85exafs: XANES, FMS
- Bruce wants OVERLAP to be retired – the concept is better done in the sense of a Demeter::SSPath using libfeffpath
- might want flags for triggering the various output files controled by feff’s PRINT card…
- [ ] build on Mac
- [ ] make scatteringpath a drop in replacement for feffdat in larch
- [ ] nosetests on result of scatteringpath with nnnn=False
- [ ] fit with different feff versions – comparison framework (begun in Bruce’s privat SCFtests git repo)
- [ ] capture information about muffin tin radii, norman radii, ionization, a lá Larch _feffdat’s potentials attribute
- [ ] f85ut.py needs to be installed into a place where larch will find
it. (see
larch> show _sys.path
, but plugins rather than modules) - [X]
need to replace ~bin/f85e~ with something that works on windows.made a runfeff method in f85ut instead - [ ]
platforms/windows/prep.sh
needs aliases for running nosetests and larch - [ ] perl wrapper cannot be linked successfully under Strawberry until a version of Strawberry using gcc 4.9 become available.
src/PAR/parallel.f
cannot be copmpiled –mpif.h
is missing- It seems as though the NOHOLE option won’t work.
rdinp
allows it, butsrc/XSPH/xsph.f
wants, whennohole.eq.2
, some data files (see lines 209 to 224) that are nowhere written in f85e - In file
src.EXCH/mpse.f
,mpse.f
did not compile with rank mismatches at lines 37 and 57. Variableedens
is defined as rank 2 and called as rank 1. I “fixed” this by adding “,1” to the argument ofedens
. This does not, in fact, get exercised in feff85exafs – triggering this bit of code was disabled when the code base was delivered to us. src/EXCH/xcpot
writes to numbered output, but in places that shouldn’t get exercised by feff85exafs.