Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider replacing do.call with something else #155

Closed
zachmayer opened this issue Jul 23, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

Consider replacing do.call with something else #155

zachmayer opened this issue Jul 23, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@zachmayer
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@jangorecki
Copy link

jangorecki commented May 16, 2016 •
edited
Loading

why not build the call instead?

as.call(list(as.name(fun.name), as.name(var.name), ...)

@zachmayer zachmayer mentioned this issue Aug 9, 2024
Closed
@zachmayer
Copy link
Owner Author

Before I do anything here, I would like to run some tests with large datasets and assess how much of a problem this is.

@zachmayer zachmayer changed the title ask on SO about do.call without.... serializing the entire damn dataset into the call Consider replacing do.call with something else Aug 10, 2024
@zachmayer zachmayer mentioned this issue Aug 10, 2024
Open
@zachmayer
Copy link
Owner Author

closed in favor of #309

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@zachmayer @jangorecki