Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ruthie Newman, C.15, Paper, Bipartition-Graph #27

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
68 changes: 64 additions & 4 deletions graphs/possible_bipartition.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,12 +1,72 @@
# Can be used for BFS
from collections import deque
from collections import deque
from pickle import FALSE

def possible_bipartition(dislikes):
""" Will return True or False if the given graph
can be bipartitioned without neighboring nodes put
into the same partition.
Time Complexity: ?
Space Complexity: ?

Time Complexity: O(1) to access the adjacency list, o(1) to iterate through the dog_dict hash map used to
organize the dislikes data into a more accessible format(w/out empty indices), o(n) to iterate through each value list of the
dictionary, which is dependent on the size of the input.

Space Complexity: O(n) for new varaibles created (visited list, dictionary) b/c the space occupied is dependent on the input.
O(E) for the adjacency list because each node in the dislikes array has a list of edges.
"""
Comment on lines 5 to 16

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Nice DFS Solution.

However the time complexity would be O(VE) where V is the number of vertices and E the number of edges.

pass

#number of nodes/dogs
num_dogs = len(dislikes)

#if adjacency list is empty == True
if num_dogs == 0:
return True

# # #You could put dislikes into an adjacecny dictionary to get rid of all empty values....
dog_dict = { i : dislikes[i] for i in range(0, len(dislikes)) if len(dislikes[i]) != 0}

#Set a value for a start node/dog to 1 b/c there is not always a dog 0
current_dog = 0

#track whether node has been vistited
dogs_visited = [False for i in range(num_dogs)]

#set start dog as visited in dog_visited
dogs_visited[current_dog] = True

# create a queue to do BFS and enqueue source vertex
dogs_q = deque()
dogs_q.append(current_dog)

groupA =[]
groupB =[]
groupA.append(current_dog)

while dogs_q:

current_dog = dogs_q.pop()

for dog, dislike in dog_dict.items():

for dis in dislike:

if dis not in dogs_visited:
dogs_visited[dis] = True
dogs_q.append(dis)

if dog in groupA and dog in groupB:
return False

if dog not in groupA and dog not in groupB:
groupA.append(dis)

elif dog in groupA and dog not in groupB:
groupB.append(dis)


elif dog in groupB and dog not in groupA:
groupA.append(dis)

return True