-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 405
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
perf, refactor: plonk prover #855
Conversation
📦 ❌ ❌
❌
|
📦 ❌ ❌
❌
|
📦 ❌ ❌
❌
|
📦 ❌ ❌
❌
|
📦 ❌ ❌
❌
|
📦 ❌ ❌
❌
|
📦 ❌ ❌
❌
|
📦 ❌ ❌ ❌ ❌
❌ ❌ ❌
❌ ❌ ❌ ❌
❌ ❌
❌ ❌ ❌
|
📦 ❌ ❌ ❌ ❌
❌ ❌ ❌
❌ ❌ ❌ ❌
❌ ❌
❌ ❌ ❌
|
📦 ❌ ❌ ❌ ❌
❌ ❌ ❌
❌ ❌ ❌ ❌
❌ ❌
❌ ❌ ❌
|
📦 ❌ ❌ ❌ ❌ ❌
❌ ❌ ❌
|
📦 ❌ ❌ ❌ ❌ ❌
|
Description
Sister PR of Consensys/gnark-crypto#456 .
Goal is to make PlonK prover less memory greedy, more performant and more readable.
How has this been benchmarked?
4M constraints;
The memory gain is actually much larger than this, since the
extended trace
in theProvingKey
is gone, for large circuits that's dozen if not hundreds of GB.