-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Merge pull request #14 from boegel/previous_tutorials
[CernVM-FS] add 'Previous tutorials' subsection
- Loading branch information
Showing
2 changed files
with
21 additions
and
2 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ | ||
\subsection*{Previous tutorials} | ||
|
||
A free online introductory tutorial on CernVM-FS was organised as a part of the 6th EasyBuild User Meeting | ||
(Jan'21)\footnote{\href{https://easybuild.io/eum21/\#cvmfs-tutorial}{https://easybuild.io/eum21/\#cvmfs-tutorial}}. | ||
It consisted of 5 short sessions (1h each), one per day in the same week, and was attended by about 25 people. | ||
A quick evaluation survey afterwards showed that 75\% of attendees rated the tutorial as "excellent", while the remaining 25\% | ||
rated it as "good". | ||
|
||
\paragraph{} | ||
More recently (Dec'23), a ``\emph{Best Practices for CernVM-FS in HPC}'' 3-hour free online tutorial | ||
was organised in the context of the MultiXscale EuroHPC Centre-of-Excellence | ||
\footnote{\href{https://multixscale.github.io/cvmfs-tutorial-hpc-best-practices}{https://multixscale.github.io/cvmfs-tutorial-hpc-best-practices}}. | ||
It was a resounding success, with over 200 registrations, and 125 actual attendees during the online session. | ||
An evaluation survey that was completed by over 50 attendees showed that the tutorial was very well received: | ||
it got an average rating of 8.64 out of 10, with 88\% giving a score of 8 or higher, and over 90\% of survey | ||
participants stating that they would "definitely" recommend the tutorial to friends or colleagues (along with 8\% | ||
answering "maybe", and one person stating "I'm not sure"). |