Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update UEF SACU Enhancement Script #6515
Update UEF SACU Enhancement Script #6515
Changes from 1 commit
62f8be3
a17801b
d69b39c
b0a8224
1ce9266
3494e16
cf3cb03
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is an unintentional change - it would always be true. See also the
RadarJammerEnh
field that is set totrue
/false
depending on whether the enhancement exists.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
After looking at this can't this just be a part of the 2 Functions for the enhancements now?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So something like
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
but then do you even need the
self.RadarJammerEnh = true
if the part its setting ti for can now be apart of the same function as it wasn't before ?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can't inline
OnIntelEnabled
because that function is called when the jamming toggle is pressed (or whenever else the jammer is enabled), while the enhancement function is called only once when the enhancement is built. Same forOnIntelDisabled
.If you did inline it, then the jammer's FX and and energy consumption would remain permanently on until the enhancement is removed.