-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GPII-3228: Implement changes in the provisioning and npm scripts in order to produce automatic installers on CI #51
Open
javihernandez
wants to merge
1
commit into
GPII:master
Choose a base branch
from
javihernandez:GPII-3228
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ | ||
<# | ||
This script renames the Windows installer according to the version received when called. | ||
#> | ||
|
||
param ( | ||
[string]$provisioningDir = (Split-Path -parent $PSCommandPath), # Default to script path. | ||
[string]$version | ||
) | ||
|
||
# Turn verbose on, change to "SilentlyContinue" for default behaviour. | ||
$VerbosePreference = "continue" | ||
|
||
# Store the project folder of the script (root of the repo) as $projectDir. | ||
$projectDir = (Get-Item $provisioningDir).parent.FullName | ||
|
||
$currentName = (Get-ChildItem -Path .\installer\ *.msi).FullName | ||
$newName = Join-Path (Join-Path $projectDir "installer") ("GPII." + $version + ".msi") | ||
|
||
Write-Output "Renaming the installer $currentName as $newName" | ||
Rename-Item $currentName $newName |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a bit funky - didn't we decide to from now on only ever roll installers/builds from npm artefacts? In which case we should be able to just fish this value from our own package.json
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is funky, yes. Let's say that this is a first spike on this, given that we would like to start creating installers automatically as commits get into master (or better said, in the "cloud-one" branch very soon), no matter whether they are ready to be shipped or not.
In an ideal release model, I would expect the "releaser" to publish the artifacts on npm, commit the bumped version of the module and create the installer locally.
In fact, I'm not sure we want to perform a real "release" after every commit/pr gets into master. Another approach would be to only create an installer every time we bump the version in the gpii-app's package.json, but still, automatic creation of installers as they land master is something that has been requested for some time.
Backing to your original question about rolling installers from npm artifacts, that would be the ideal thing to do, but would require some extra work in the provisioning scripts and on CI as well. I'm not sure whether you prefer to absolutely go for it now or just start doing "something" in line with what we would like to end up with and as a temporary way of providing installers in an automatic way.
Anyway, happy to know your thoughts on this, maybe it's worth having a call, at this moment, it's been just Alfredo and I who have tried to put all the pieces together and come up with this first step.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can CI just sneak the build number (ie, the "285" from the url in #51 (comment)) into a file?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess that the output log is being stored in the CI but outside the windows VM, so I'm not sure this is a good approach, specially if we need to test this in a local dev environment.