fix/time interval on cool down email verification process

[kkatusic]

• Implement timer "cooldown" to email verification email request #4890

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes

  • Improved email verification cooldown timer management
  • Enhanced reliability of email verification process

• Refactor

  • Simplified cooldown timer logic
  • Streamlined interval handling for email verification

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
giveth-dapps-v2	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Jan 13, 2025 0:34am

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the InputUserEmailVerify.tsx component to improve the management of the email verification cooldown timer. The key change involves adjusting the intervalId declaration to be a variable that can be accessed and cleared across function calls, rather than being confined to a local function scope. This modification enhances the flexibility of managing the cooldown interval, allowing for more precise control over the timer's lifecycle during the email verification process.

Changes

File	Change Summary
src/components/InputUserEmailVerify.tsx	- Modified intervalId declaration to be a persistent variable - Updated interval management to allow direct access to interval ID - Simplified cooldown display logic

Suggested reviewers

• mateodaza
• CarlosQ96

Possibly related PRs

• Feat/add cooldown varify email #4931: Changes related to email verification cooldown management with similar state variable and logic modifications

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Ode to Timers Refined

Intervals dance, no longer confined,
Cooldown ticks with a clearer design,
Variables leap, beyond local bind,
Email verification, now streamlined!
Code hops forward, logic realigned 🕰️

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

src/components/InputUserEmailVerify.tsx (1)

500-531: Simplify cooldown timer UI structure and improve time formatting

The current implementation has:

1. Unnecessary nesting of InputCodeDesc components
2. Complex string manipulation for time formatting

Consider these improvements:

- <InputCodeDesc>
-   {isCooldown && (
-     <InputCodeDesc>
+   {isCooldown && (
      <FormattedMessage
        id='label.email_cooldown'
        values={{
          button: chunks => (
            <button
              type='button'
              onClick={verificationEmailHandler}
              disabled={isCooldown}
            >
              {chunks}
            </button>
          ),
          time: () => (
            <b>
-             {Math.floor(cooldownTime / 60)}
-             :
-             {('0' + (cooldownTime % 60)).slice(-2)}
+             {`${Math.floor(cooldownTime / 60)}:${cooldownTime % 60}`.padStart(5, '0')}
            </b>
          ),
        }}
      />
-     </InputCodeDesc>
    )}

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c68dbeb and e2489ae.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/components/InputUserEmailVerify.tsx (5 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)

• GitHub Check: build

🔇 Additional comments (2)

src/components/InputUserEmailVerify.tsx (2)

337-342: LGTM! Good cleanup sequence

The cleanup sequence is well-structured:

1. Reset cooldown state first
2. Clear the interval timer

---

Line range hint 238-548: Verify the cooldown duration matches requirements

The cooldown timer is set to 180 seconds (3 minutes). Please confirm if this duration aligns with the business requirements.

✅ Verification successful

Cooldown duration of 180 seconds is correctly implemented

The 3-minute cooldown aligns with the UI text expectations across all language files and follows common security practices for email verification systems.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any configuration or constants defining email verification cooldown time
rg -i "cooldown|timeout|interval.*email.*verif" --type ts

Length of output: 5683

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for documentation files and configuration files that might contain email verification requirements
echo "=== Searching documentation files ==="
fd -e md -e mdx | xargs rg -i "email.*verif|cooldown|timeout"

echo -e "\n=== Searching configuration files ==="
fd -e json -e yaml -e yml -e env | xargs rg -i "email.*verif|cooldown|timeout"

Length of output: 7035