Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(Do not merge) Testing code coverage #501

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

marshallward
Copy link
Member

Checking if the code coverage token is being applied for PRs.

Do not merge!

Checking if the code coverage token is being applied for PRs.

Do not merge!
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 12, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #501 (43443b1) into dev/gfdl (bd4c87c) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on dev/gfdl.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

❗ Current head 43443b1 differs from pull request most recent head 868fe61. Consider uploading reports for the commit 868fe61 to get more accurate results

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           dev/gfdl     #501      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     37.79%   37.78%   -0.02%     
============================================
  Files           270      270              
  Lines         78404    78431      +27     
  Branches      14521    14525       +4     
============================================
+ Hits          29636    29637       +1     
- Misses        43364    43389      +25     
- Partials       5404     5405       +1     
Files Coverage Δ
src/user/dyed_channel_initialization.F90 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/user/dyed_obcs_initialization.F90 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/tracer/MOM_tracer_registry.F90 64.12% <0.00%> (-0.41%) ⬇️
src/user/DOME_initialization.F90 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/core/MOM_open_boundary.F90 24.28% <0.00%> (-0.15%) ⬇️
src/tracer/MOM_tracer_advect.F90 58.79% <0.00%> (-0.77%) ⬇️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@marshallward
Copy link
Member Author

Codecov token seems to be properly applied; closing.

@marshallward marshallward deleted the codecov_token_test branch February 28, 2024 16:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant