-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Minor tidy up, and skip the tests if no file is found. #295
Merged
samcunliffe
merged 4 commits into
181-pairdev-write-dataset-to-group
from
181-pairdev-tidyup-plus-skip-tests
May 16, 2023
Merged
Minor tidy up, and skip the tests if no file is found. #295
samcunliffe
merged 4 commits into
181-pairdev-write-dataset-to-group
from
181-pairdev-tidyup-plus-skip-tests
May 16, 2023
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* Update catch2. v3.3 has some nice features. Including a SKIP() macro. 💙 * Skip the segfault test.
Since we're introducing a bit of complexity into the unit-testing framework, at least we should skip the tests (developer quality of life) with a nice warning explaining why.
samcunliffe
commented
May 15, 2023
willGraham01
approved these changes
May 15, 2023
2 lines → 1. And gets rid of another global. Co-authored-by: willGraham01 <[email protected]>
samcunliffe
commented
May 16, 2023
willGraham01
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2023
* Update catch2 (#275) * Update catch2. v3.3 has some nice features. Including a SKIP() macro. 💙 * Skip the segfault test. * SKIP unit tests if sample data not generated. Since we're introducing a bit of complexity into the unit-testing framework, at least we should skip the tests (developer quality of life) with a nice warning explaining why. * Skip function. 2 lines → 1. And gets rid of another global. Co-authored-by: willGraham01 <[email protected]> * Revert to explicitly skipping the broken test. --------- Co-authored-by: willGraham01 <[email protected]>
willGraham01
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2023
* Update catch2 (#275) * Update catch2. v3.3 has some nice features. Including a SKIP() macro. 💙 * Skip the segfault test. * SKIP unit tests if sample data not generated. Since we're introducing a bit of complexity into the unit-testing framework, at least we should skip the tests (developer quality of life) with a nice warning explaining why. * Skip function. 2 lines → 1. And gets rid of another global. Co-authored-by: willGraham01 <[email protected]> * Revert to explicitly skipping the broken test. --------- Co-authored-by: willGraham01 <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Context/Description
Possibly overkill but in the interest of small PRs (cough cough). Here is a tweak to your small data sample unit tests which skips them if the data not found. This is a PR against our draft branch from Friday (so you know what I'm proposing).
Still TODO: decide whether to provide instructions to generate them here in the logging. What do you think?
H5::Group
s. #294main
:🐢
🐢
🐢
Testing
Checked locally with