Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update README.md #51

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update README.md #51

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Johnnexto
Copy link
Contributor

Added comment from [email protected];

In Solar.web, the energy balance does not display grid charge information to prevent customers from perceiving a higher consumption than actual. This is done to simplify the Solar.web view.

Added comment from [email protected];

In Solar.web, the energy balance does not display grid charge information to prevent customers from perceiving a higher consumption than actual. This is done to simplify the Solar.web view.
@@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ Indeed, it is possible to charge at night, but the process is static. Many times
- the minimum reserve of the battery not to go below
- the time range when the energy operator offers cheaper electricity to force the charge.

NOTE:
Copy link
Owner

@atbore-phx atbore-phx Jan 22, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hi @Johnnexto ,
I've checked and I can see the grid consumption on Solarweb, I'm missing something here, What does this note mean? and How is it related to sbam?
image

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is correct, but it is only power consumed from grid, not power to battery. Please see screenshot as of today, energy balance today shows consumption max 10,62 kW for a few hours (charing battery)
And when looking at consumption details, its on average 3 kW and does not include the charge to battery.
I queried Fronius and got reply as follows;

"Buenos días John

In Solar.web, the energy balance does not display grid charge information to prevent customers from perceiving a higher consumption than actual. This is done to simplify the Solar.web view.

Regarding Solar.web Query API, this feature is exclusively available for installer accounts, and therefore, we cannot enable it for your user account."

API was for solarweb.com to see if possible to add as comparison forecast (Premium account)

Energypanel in home assist is displaying correct values. (Try to compare to verify)

Skjermbilde 2025-01-22 kl  08 22 57 Skjermbilde 2025-01-22 kl  08 22 27

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As far as I know It relate to all forced charging for grid applications, not only SBAM. Its just a note to be aware of the "problem"

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Solarweb does not take into consideration grid to battery, from grid, is only consumption from grid, grid to battery is not included in Solarweb as grid consumption.
If you have a look at the monthly stats calculations doesn't add up.
Ie: Solarweb says 469 kWh from grid, total consumption is 1618 kWh, further production is 950 kWh;
Consumption from grid should have been Consumption - Production = 1618 - 950 = 668 kWh
However solar web says 469 kWh from grid. (Difference I assume is grid to battery, 668-469=199)
That was the reason I checked with Fronius.. Solarweb doesn't have correct values, and they are happy with it. Just a warning to other solar web users charging from grid.
If I check with network owner, from grid 01.01-21.01 is 710 kWh (they are issuing the data for the invoice and responsible for measuring consumption.) vs solar web from grid 469 kWh the difference would more or less be what the grid to battery consumption should be. At least I am getting billed for that consumption.

Skjermbilde 2025-01-22 kl  12 03 09 Skjermbilde 2025-01-22 kl  12 09 28 Skjermbilde 2025-01-22 kl  12 17 30

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants