Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(swamp/share): cover share module with swamp tests #4036

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vgonkivs
Copy link
Member

self-explanatory

@vgonkivs vgonkivs added area:shares Shares and samples kind:testing Related to unit tests swamp Related to Integration tests labels Jan 10, 2025
@vgonkivs vgonkivs self-assigned this Jan 10, 2025
@vgonkivs vgonkivs force-pushed the cover_share_with_swamp_tests branch from 06f683d to 6cd9e3b Compare January 10, 2025 14:03
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 15 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 45.28%. Comparing base (2469e7a) to head (6cd9e3b).
Report is 413 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
share/shwap/sample.go 0.00% 15 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4036      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   44.83%   45.28%   +0.45%     
==========================================
  Files         265      309      +44     
  Lines       14620    22201    +7581     
==========================================
+ Hits         6555    10054    +3499     
- Misses       7313    11068    +3755     
- Partials      752     1079     +327     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:shares Shares and samples kind:testing Related to unit tests swamp Related to Integration tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants