[IMP] cetmix_tower_server: Access to server fields #182
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
cetmix_tower_server/models/cx_tower_server.py (2)
743-747: Ensure consistent use of sudo() throughout the method.While adding
sudo()for checkingssh_usernameanduse_sudoattributes is good for security, consider applying it consistently to all attribute accesses in this method for better maintainability.Consider applying this pattern:
-if self.sudo().ssh_username != "root" and self.sudo().use_sudo: - sudo = self.sudo().use_sudo +self_sudo = self.sudo() +if self_sudo.ssh_username != "root" and self_sudo.use_sudo: + sudo = self_sudo.use_sudo -elif sudo and self.sudo().ssh_username == "root": +elif sudo and self_sudo.ssh_username == "root": sudo = None
Line range hint
563-574: Enhance error handling in the _connect method.While adding
sudo()for server connection is good, consider improving the error handling to provide more specific error messages based on the type of connection failure (e.g., authentication failure, network unreachable, etc.).Consider this approach:
self = self.sudo() try: client = SSH( host=self.ip_v4_address or self.ip_v6_address, port=self.ssh_port, username=self.ssh_username, mode=self.ssh_auth_mode, password=self._get_password(), ssh_key=self._get_ssh_key(), ) except Exception as e: + error_msg = str(e) + if "Authentication failed" in error_msg: + error_msg = _("SSH authentication failed. Please check your credentials.") + elif "Connection refused" in error_msg: + error_msg = _("Connection refused. Please check if the server is running and accessible.") + elif "Network is unreachable" in error_msg: + error_msg = _("Network is unreachable. Please check your network connection.") if raise_on_error: - raise ValidationError(_("SSH connection error %(err)s", err=e)) from e + raise ValidationError(_("SSH connection error: %(err)s", err=error_msg)) from e else: - return False, e + return False, error_msgcetmix_tower_server/views/cx_tower_server_view.xml (2)
108-135: Consider removing redundant group restriction in view.Since the fields (
os_id,ip_v4_address,ip_v6_address) already have group restrictions defined at the model level, thegroups_idfield in the view might be unnecessary. The model-level restrictions will automatically handle the access control.Consider this simplified approach:
<record id="cx_tower_server_view_kanban_manager" model="ir.ui.view"> <field name="name">cx.tower.server.view.kanban</field> <field name="model">cx.tower.server</field> <field name="inherit_id" ref="cetmix_tower_server.cx_tower_server_view_kanban" /> - <field - name="groups_id" - eval="[(4, ref('cetmix_tower_server.group_manager'))]" - /> <field name="arch" type="xml"> <xpath expr="//div[hasclass('o_kanban_primary_right')]" position="inside"> <!-- ... rest of the view definition ... --> </xpath> </field> </record>
Line range hint
375-399: Optimize group restrictions in search view.The
groupsattribute on theos_idfield is redundant as it's already restricted at the model level. However, the group restriction on the "Group By OS" filter is correct and necessary as it's a view-specific feature.Consider this optimization:
- <field name="os_id" groups="cetmix_tower_server.group_manager" /> + <field name="os_id" /> <field name="tag_ids" /> <!-- ... other fields ... --> <filter string="OS" name="group_by_os" domain="[]" context="{'group_by': 'os_id'}" groups="cetmix_tower_server.group_manager" />
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
cetmix_tower_server/models/cx_tower_server.py(6 hunks)cetmix_tower_server/views/cx_tower_server_view.xml(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
cetmix_tower_server/views/cx_tower_server_view.xml (1)
Learnt from: ivs-cetmix
PR: cetmix/cetmix-tower#147
File: cetmix_tower_server/views/cx_tower_file_view.xml:160-160
Timestamp: 2024-11-24T22:56:35.204Z
Learning: In Odoo, when groups are defined at the model level, it's unnecessary to specify them again in the view fields.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: test with OCB
🔇 Additional comments (1)
cetmix_tower_server/models/cx_tower_server.py (1)
Line range hint
282-340: Well-structured security enhancement for sensitive server fields!The consistent application of group-based access control (
groups="cetmix_tower_server.group_manager") to all sensitive server connection fields is a good security practice. This ensures that only users with appropriate permissions can access critical server details.
GabbasovDinar
force-pushed
the
14.0-t4116-cetmix_tower_server-access
branch
from
7e6dad2 to
022d74c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
cetmix_tower_server/views/cx_tower_server_view.xml (1)
375-375: Consider removing redundant group restrictions.Based on previous feedback, when groups are defined at the model level, it's unnecessary to specify them again in the view fields.
- <field name="os_id" groups="cetmix_tower_server.group_manager" /> + <field name="os_id" />- groups="cetmix_tower_server.group_manager" +Also applies to: 399-399
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
cetmix_tower_server/models/cx_tower_server.py(6 hunks)cetmix_tower_server/readme/CONFIGURE.md(1 hunks)cetmix_tower_server/views/cx_tower_server_view.xml(3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- cetmix_tower_server/models/cx_tower_server.py
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
cetmix_tower_server/views/cx_tower_server_view.xml (1)
Learnt from: ivs-cetmix
PR: cetmix/cetmix-tower#147
File: cetmix_tower_server/views/cx_tower_file_view.xml:160-160
Timestamp: 2024-11-24T22:56:35.204Z
Learning: In Odoo, when groups are defined at the model level, it's unnecessary to specify them again in the view fields.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: test with OCB
🔇 Additional comments (2)
cetmix_tower_server/views/cx_tower_server_view.xml (1)
108-135: LGTM! Well-structured view inheritance for manager-specific fields.The implementation correctly extends the base kanban view while maintaining proper access control and visibility conditions.
cetmix_tower_server/readme/CONFIGURE.md (1)
43-44: LGTM! Clear documentation update.The added note effectively communicates the access-level-based field visibility to users.
GabbasovDinar
force-pushed
the
14.0-t4116-cetmix_tower_server-access
branch
from
022d74c to
da74aec
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
cetmix_tower_server/views/cx_tower_server_view.xml (2)
108-135: Consider removing redundant field declarations.Based on the retrieved learning from PR #147, since these fields (
os_id,ip_v4_address,ip_v6_address) are already defined with group restrictions at the model level, it's unnecessary to create a separate inherited view just for managers. The base kanban view can directly use these fields, and Odoo will automatically handle the access control.Consider removing this entire view and moving the field declarations to the base kanban view's content section. The model-level group restrictions will automatically apply.
375-375: Optimize group restrictions in search view.
- The group restriction on the
os_idfield (line 375) is redundant if the field is already restricted at the model level.- However, the group restriction on the "Group By OS" filter (line 399) should be retained as it's a view-specific feature.
Remove the redundant group restriction from the
os_idfield while keeping it for the "Group By OS" filter:- <field name="os_id" groups="cetmix_tower_server.group_manager" /> + <field name="os_id" />Also applies to: 399-399
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
cetmix_tower_server/models/cx_tower_server.py(6 hunks)cetmix_tower_server/readme/CONFIGURE.md(1 hunks)cetmix_tower_server/views/cx_tower_server_view.xml(3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- cetmix_tower_server/readme/CONFIGURE.md
- cetmix_tower_server/models/cx_tower_server.py
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
cetmix_tower_server/views/cx_tower_server_view.xml (1)
Learnt from: ivs-cetmix
PR: cetmix/cetmix-tower#147
File: cetmix_tower_server/views/cx_tower_file_view.xml:160-160
Timestamp: 2024-11-24T22:56:35.204Z
Learning: In Odoo, when groups are defined at the model level, it's unnecessary to specify them again in the view fields.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: test with OCB
Limit access to the following fields of the cx.tower.server odel to Manager and Root: - OS - IP v4 Address - IP v6 Address - SSH username - SSH Port - SSS auth mode - SSH key - Use sudo Task: 4116
GabbasovDinar
force-pushed
the
14.0-t4116-cetmix_tower_server-access
branch
from
da74aec to
d04cce2
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
cetmix_tower_server/models/cx_tower_server.py (1)
563-563: Avoid Overwritingselfwithself.sudo()Reassigning
selfwithself.sudo()can lead to confusion and unintended side effects. It's clearer and safer to store the result in a new variable or useself.sudo()directly when accessing attributes.Refactor the code to avoid reassigning
self:def _connect(self, raise_on_error=True): self.ensure_one() - self = self.sudo() try: + sudo_self = self.sudo() client = SSH( - host=self.ip_v4_address or self.ip_v6_address, - port=self.ssh_port, - username=self.ssh_username, - mode=self.ssh_auth_mode, - password=self._get_password(), - ssh_key=self._get_ssh_key(), + host=sudo_self.ip_v4_address or sudo_self.ip_v6_address, + port=sudo_self.ssh_port, + username=sudo_self.ssh_username, + mode=sudo_self.ssh_auth_mode, + password=sudo_self._get_password(), + ssh_key=sudo_self._get_ssh_key(), )
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
cetmix_tower_server/models/cetmix_tower.py(1 hunks)cetmix_tower_server/models/cx_tower_server.py(6 hunks)cetmix_tower_server/readme/CONFIGURE.md(1 hunks)cetmix_tower_server/views/cx_tower_server_view.xml(3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- cetmix_tower_server/readme/CONFIGURE.md
- cetmix_tower_server/views/cx_tower_server_view.xml
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
cetmix_tower_server/models/cetmix_tower.py (1)
Learnt from: ivs-cetmix
PR: cetmix/cetmix-tower#174
File: cetmix_tower_server/models/cetmix_tower.py:130-132
Timestamp: 2025-01-06T12:28:58.379Z
Learning: SSH credentials (username, password, and/or key) are controlled at the server level, so an additional validation in the `server_check_ssh_connection` method is not needed.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: test with OCB
🔇 Additional comments (3)
cetmix_tower_server/models/cx_tower_server.py (2)
677-677: Ensure Elevated Access is NecessaryUsing
self.sudo()inget_variable_valuessuggests that elevated permissions are required. Confirm that this is necessary and that it doesn't unintentionally expose sensitive data to unauthorized users.Please verify that
self.sudo()is required here and consider potential security implications.
743-744: Consistent Use of Elevated PermissionsAccessing
ssh_usernameanduse_sudowithself.sudo()ensures that fields restricted by groups are accessible. Ensure that this pattern is used consistently where needed and that it complies with your security model.Also applies to: 747-747
cetmix_tower_server/models/cetmix_tower.py (1)
134-136: Verify Necessity of Elevatingservertosudo()Adding
server = server.sudo()elevates access rights to all fields ofserver. According to previous learnings, SSH credentials are managed at the server level, and additional validation might not be necessary.Based on retrieved learnings:
Learning: SSH credentials (username, password, and/or key) are controlled at the server level, so an additional validation in the `server_check_ssh_connection` method is not needed.Please verify if elevating
servertosudo()is required in this context, and ensure it aligns with the application's security policies without introducing unintended access.✅ Verification successful
The
sudo()elevation is necessary and correctly implementedThe elevation is required to access sensitive SSH credentials (password, keys) which are protected fields. This follows the application's security model where sensitive fields require elevated access, as evidenced by similar patterns across the codebase for handling SSH credentials and secret values.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get the complete file content cat cetmix_tower_server/models/cetmix_tower.py # Look for similar sudo() patterns rg "sudo\(\)" -A 3 -B 3 # Look for field definitions that might be sensitive ast-grep --pattern 'fields.$_ = fields.$_($$$)'Length of output: 20443
| @@ -360,7 +372,7 @@ | |||
| <field name="name" /> | |||
| <field name="reference" /> | |||
| <field name="status" /> | |||
| <field name="os_id" /> | |||
| <field name="os_id" groups="cetmix_tower_server.group_manager" /> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Question: why do we need to add group attribute to the view definition?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I agree, I will fix it
Limit access to the following fields of the
cx.tower.servermodel to Manager and Root:Task: 4116
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
Security Enhancements
User Interface
Documentation