Transactionalize

[nelz9999]

This is the candidate work to address Issue #6.

Builds upon PR #8...

Most of the changes are procedural, but the change in OnBeep@11ac6eb affects the randomness of the ephemeral values by sacrificing a single bit (out of 256) of entropy in favor of enforcing a 32-byte representation.

[nelz9999]

Also, for symmetry's sake, I added the functionality to both sides: Verifier (bytes_b) and User (bytes_a).

[nelz9999]

@cocagne Is there anything I can do to ease the integration of this?

[cocagne]

Thanks Nelz. I'm currently attending the Storage Developers Conference and
probably won't be able to take a look at your patches for a few more days.
I'll let you know as soon as I get the chance.

Tom
On Sep 17, 2014 9:53 AM, "Nelz" [email protected] wrote:

@cocagne https://github.com/cocagne Is there anything I can do to ease
the integration of this?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#9 (comment).

[cocagne]

Looks really good overall Nelz. Just a few standard pointer handling issues and memory leaks to address before merging.

[nelz9999]

I've addressed most of your comments, except for the bit around single- vs. double-pointers, which I commented on above.

(Please pardon my slowness, it's been a LONG time since I've done any C, and I've been super reliant on https://github.com/radii for his C excellence.)

[nelz9999]

Awesome! Thanks!

[cocagne]

No problem. Thanks for the patch. If you don't see the new version up on
pypi in the next couple of days, ping me.

Tom

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Nelz [email protected] wrote:

Awesome! Thanks!

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#9 (comment).