Implement auto-recovery #395
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mobin-2008
added
Enhancement/New Feature
|
Thanks - I will try to review soon |
davmac314
requested changes
Oct 18, 2024
|
One other thing - the man page (doc/manpages/dinit.8.m4) needs to be updated with the new option. |
In some setups it makes sense to launch dinit with --auto-recovery and handle boot failures purely via the recovery service always.
JamiKettunen
force-pushed
the
auto-recovery
branch
from
da29bfe to
07ba1d4
Compare
|
I invite contributors to add themselves to the CONTRIBUTORS file if they wish. You are welcome to do this by opening another pull request with that change. Thanks again. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In some setups it makes sense to launch dinit with
--auto-recoveryand handle boot failures purely via therecoveryservice always. Likely missing some stuff etc but this implements the feature in a hopefully proper way.Fixes #387.