fix: prettier #277
fix: prettier #277
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve a restructuring of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
examples/example-vite-react-sdk/src/main.tsx (1)
30-30: Handle potential null return fromgetElementById.Using
document.getElementById("root")!assumes that the element always exists. To prevent potential runtime errors if the element is not found, add a null check before proceeding.Example:
- createRoot(document.getElementById("root")!).render( + const rootElement = document.getElementById("root"); + if (rootElement) { + createRoot(rootElement).render( + // ... + ); + } else { + console.error("Root element with id 'root' not found."); + // Optionally, render an alternative UI or handle the error appropriately. + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- examples/example-vite-react-sdk/src/App.tsx (4 hunks)
- examples/example-vite-react-sdk/src/main.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (6)
examples/example-vite-react-sdk/src/App.tsx (6)
3-4: LGTM: Import statements updated correctly.The new import of
ParsedEntityandSDKfrom "@dojoengine/sdk" aligns well with the changes in the component's structure, where the database connection is now passed as a prop.
6-6: Excellent: Function signature updated to accept database as a prop.This change improves the component's design by:
- Externalizing the database initialization, adhering to the principle of separation of concerns.
- Enhancing testability by allowing the database to be mocked or injected.
- Providing type safety for the
dbprop with theSDK<Schema>type.These improvements contribute to a more maintainable and flexible codebase.
105-105: Correct: Effect dependency updated for entity fetching.Adding
dbto the dependency array of the entity fetching effect is the right approach. This ensures that the effect runs when the database connection changes, maintaining consistency with the new prop-based structure of the component.
Line range hint
107-143: LGTM: Render logic remains consistent.The component's render logic has been maintained, correctly mapping over the
entitiesstate to display each entity's details. This consistency suggests that the changes to the database connection handling haven't affected the structure of the entity data, which is good for maintaining the component's functionality.
Line range hint
1-145: Summary: Improved component design with externalized database connection.The changes in this file significantly improve the component's design and maintainability:
- Externalizing the database connection as a prop enhances flexibility and testability.
- Updating effect dependencies to include
dbensures proper reactivity to database connection changes.- The core functionality and rendering logic remain intact, maintaining the component's primary purpose.
These improvements align well with React best practices and the principle of separation of concerns. However, keep an eye on the performance impact of the simplified query filter (line 17). If you notice any issues with data volume or query performance, consider refining the filter criteria.
Overall, these changes represent a positive step towards a more robust and maintainable codebase.
17-17: Query simplification and effect dependency update.
The query filter has been simplified to an empty object
{}. While this change simplifies the code, it might lead to fetching more data than necessary. Consider whether a more specific filter would be more appropriate for your use case to optimize performance.Adding
dbto the dependency array is correct. It ensures that the effect runs when the database connection changes, maintaining consistency with the new prop-based approach.To ensure that the empty query doesn't lead to performance issues, let's check the data volume:
This will help us understand the typical data volume logged after each query response.
Also applies to: 55-55
| domain: { | ||
| name: "Example", | ||
| version: "1.0", | ||
| chainId: "your-chain-id", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace placeholder chainId with the actual value.
The chainId is currently set to "your-chain-id". Please update this to the correct chain ID for your environment to ensure proper connectivity and functionality.
| main().catch((error) => { | ||
| console.error("Failed to initialize the application:", error); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance user feedback on initialization failure.
If the application fails to initialize, the error is only logged to the console. Consider providing a user-friendly error message or rendering a fallback UI to inform the user about the issue.
| async function main() { | ||
| const db = await init<Schema>( | ||
| { | ||
| client: { | ||
| rpcUrl: dojoConfig.rpcUrl, | ||
| toriiUrl: dojoConfig.toriiUrl, | ||
| relayUrl: dojoConfig.relayUrl, | ||
| worldAddress: dojoConfig.manifest.world.address, | ||
| }, | ||
| domain: { | ||
| name: "Example", | ||
| version: "1.0", | ||
| chainId: "your-chain-id", | ||
| revision: "1", | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| schema | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| createRoot(document.getElementById("root")!).render( | ||
| <StrictMode> | ||
| <App db={db} /> | ||
| </StrictMode> | ||
| ); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider handling initialization within React components.
Initializing the database before rendering delays the application's initial render, which may lead to a blank screen during the wait. To improve user experience, consider moving the initialization logic inside the App component or a higher-order component. This allows you to display loading states or spinners while the initialization is in progress.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Appcomponent.mainfunction, improving app startup reliability.Bug Fixes
useEffectto ensure proper functionality with default parameters.