Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Advance RFC #0763 "Asset Import Spec" to Stage Ready for Release #983

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

emberjs-rfcs-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@emberjs-rfcs-bot emberjs-rfcs-bot commented Oct 27, 2023

Advance #763 to the Ready For Release Stage

Summary

This pull request is advancing the RFC to the Ready For Release Stage.

An FCP is required before merging this PR to advance.

Upon merging this PR, automation will open a draft PR for this RFC to move to the Released Stage.

Ready for Release Stage Description

This stage is complete when the implementation is complete according to plan outlined in the RFC, and is in harmony with any changes in Ember that have occurred since the RFC was first written. This includes any necessary learning materials. At this stage, features or deprecations may be available for use behind a feature flag, or with an optional package, etc.

For codebase changes, there are no open questions that are anticipated to require breaking changes; the Ember team is ready to commit to the stability of any interfaces exposed by the current implementation of the feature.

This stage should include a list of criteria for determining when the proposal can be considered Recommended after being Released.

An FCP is required to move into this stage.

Each Ember core team will be requested as a reviewer on the PR to move into this stage. A representative of each team adds a review. If a team does not respond to the request, and after the conclusion of the FCP, it is assumed that the release may proceed.

Checklist to move to Ready for Release

  • Implementation is complete according to plan outlined in the RFC, with any adjustments noted in the RFC
  • Any necessary learning materials have been updated
  • The Ember team is ready to commit to the stability of any interfaces exposed by the current implementation of the feature. This is the go/no go decision for any feature flags, but the flags should only be turned on when moving to Released.
  • Criteria for moving to the Recommended Stage has been filled out
  • This PR has been converted from a draft to a regular PR and the Final Comment Period label has been added to start the FCP
  • Each team has been added as a reviewer to the PR at the start of the FCP. Reviews are not required by the end of the FCP. This is a notification step.
    • Framework @emberjs/framework
    • Data @emberjs/ember-data-core
    • CLI @emberjs/cli
    • Learning @emberjs/learning-core
    • Typescript @emberjs/typescript-core
    • Steering @emberjs/steering

Criteria for moving to Recommended (required)

A set of criteria for moving this RFC to the Recommended Stage, following release:

  1. The "How we teach this" section of the RFC links directly to the required documentation updates.
  2. Update tutorial to use this feature for static images, etc.
  3. Update ember-welcome-page as a useful example.

Track Implementation

  • Working implementation in embroider.
  • Working implementation in classic builds (using ember-auto-import).

@emberjs-rfcs-bot emberjs-rfcs-bot added RFC Advancement S-Ready for Release PR to move to the Ready for Release Stage labels Oct 27, 2023
@ef4 ef4 self-assigned this Dec 1, 2023
@ef4 ef4 assigned ef4 and unassigned ef4 Jan 30, 2024
@simonihmig
Copy link
Contributor

Leaving a few links here covering support status across the JS ecosystem as relevant to us:

Tl;dr: it's on people's minds, but nothing available and it seems nobody is actively working on it! 😟

@lgarron
Copy link

lgarron commented Jan 18, 2025

Leaving a few links here covering support status across the JS ecosystem as relevant to us:

Tl;dr: it's on people's minds, but nothing available and it seems nobody is actively working on it! 😟

I don't use Ember JS, but as someone involved with those issues I'm really glad to see activity here!

I'd be happy to advise or help out, as it would be extremely valuable for me as a library author to have support in the major bundlers (or anything else that resolves an import graph).

As covered in https://github.com/emberjs/rfcs/pull/763/files import.meta.resolve(…) was specifically designed with clear semantics that bundlers could us, and has been widely supported by all runtimes for a while now. It is also practical to rewrite to new URL(…, import.meta.url) for older browsers and runtimes. So I think it's definitely as good a time as ever to start supporting it.

I notived the PR doesn't mention TypeScript. I assume if someone is using TypeScript with Ember, they'd be able to resolve to .ts files just like .js files in the import graph?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
RFC Advancement S-Ready for Release PR to move to the Ready for Release Stage
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants