Use constexpr instead of #define
#1598
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Rangi42
added
rgbasm
Rangi42
force-pushed
the
lexer-buf-size
branch
from
e17236a to
b716289
Compare
Rangi42
changed the title
constexpr instead of #define LEXER_BUF_SIZEconstexpr instead of #define
Rangi42
force-pushed
the
lexer-buf-size
branch
from
b716289 to
2828ec0
Compare
Rangi42
added
rgblink
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This allows for typechecking, avoids expansion precedence issues, and continues in the vein of replacing C idioms with C++ (when it's zero-cost and safer, simpler, more robust, or otherwise better to do so).