Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Skip failed claims on Reality #649

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 20, 2025
Merged

Skip failed claims on Reality #649

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 20, 2025

Conversation

kongzii
Copy link
Contributor

@kongzii kongzii commented Jan 20, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 20, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the claim_all_bonds_on_reality function in the omen_resolve_replicated.py file. A new optional parameter skip_failed with a default value of True is added to the claim_bonds_on_realitio_questions function call. This change allows the bond claiming process to continue even if some individual claims fail, enhancing the robustness of the claiming mechanism by preventing the entire process from being blocked due to isolated claim failures.

Changes

File Change Summary
prediction_market_agent/agents/replicate_to_omen_agent/omen_resolve_replicated.py Added skip_failed=True parameter to claim_bonds_on_realitio_questions function call in claim_all_bonds_on_reality method

Possibly related PRs

  • Fixes for Replicator #562: Changes in omen_replicate.py involving error handling and logging processes, potentially related to the bond claiming failure strategy

Suggested reviewers

  • gabrielfior
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@@ -202,6 +202,8 @@ def claim_all_bonds_on_reality(
api_keys,
questions,
auto_withdraw=True,
# Skip failed claims, because we don't want to block the whole process because of some failed claim.
skip_failed=True,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know what happened, but this question was failing for a week to claim bonds on it.

However, as I was debugging it, on 5th try or so it suddenly passed (without any fix from my side).

So let's just skip any exceptions during claiming, as that shouldn't stop OFVChallenger from challenging/claming the next ones.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
prediction_market_agent/agents/replicate_to_omen_agent/omen_resolve_replicated.py (1)

205-206: LGTM! Consider enhancing the comment.

The change to skip failed claims is a good defensive programming practice, making the system more resilient to transient failures. This is well-supported by the real-world example where claims occasionally fail but succeed on retry.

Consider enhancing the comment to be more specific about the types of failures that can occur:

-        # Skip failed claims, because we don't want to block the whole process because of some failed claim.
+        # Skip failed claims to prevent transient failures (e.g., network issues, temporary contract state)
+        # from blocking the entire claiming process. Claims that fail can be retried in the next run.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2189f11 and 6e452c0.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • poetry.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock, !**/*.lock
  • pyproject.toml is excluded by !**/*.toml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • prediction_market_agent/agents/replicate_to_omen_agent/omen_resolve_replicated.py (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: test-build-image
  • GitHub Check: pytest-docker
  • GitHub Check: pytest
  • GitHub Check: mypy

@kongzii kongzii merged commit 808006f into main Jan 20, 2025
10 checks passed
@kongzii kongzii deleted the peter/fixofv branch January 20, 2025 16:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants